Skip to content

Conversation

GoldsteinE
Copy link
Contributor

Closes #95795

@rustbot rustbot added the T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Aug 1, 2022
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @michaelwoerister

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Aug 1, 2022
@GoldsteinE
Copy link
Contributor Author

GoldsteinE commented Aug 1, 2022

This probably could be MachineApplicable, but I don’t see a clean way to get a span that includes the comma there.

@GoldsteinE
Copy link
Contributor Author

It’s also not clear whether this should work for tuples. Consider:

let (x, unused1, unused2, ..) = tuple;

There’re three suggestion options here:

  1. Suggest to ignore both fields (current)
  2. Suggest to ignore first field and to remove the second (kinda weird I guess?)
  3. Suggest to remove both fields (clean, but then the first suggestion is wrong in isolation)

@GoldsteinE GoldsteinE force-pushed the try-removing-the-field branch from 3ef9e4b to 6810458 Compare August 1, 2022 18:54
Copy link
Member

@michaelwoerister michaelwoerister left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the PR, @GoldsteinE!

I left some comments below.

@GoldsteinE
Copy link
Contributor Author

@michaelwoerister Thanks for the review! I implemented your suggestions

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@GoldsteinE GoldsteinE force-pushed the try-removing-the-field branch from 3609afe to 3fb249b Compare August 12, 2022 09:33
@michaelwoerister
Copy link
Member

Thanks, @GoldsteinE!

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 15, 2022

📌 Commit 3e0df4b has been approved by michaelwoerister

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Aug 15, 2022
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 15, 2022
… r=michaelwoerister

improve "try ignoring the field" diagnostic

Closes rust-lang#95795
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 15, 2022
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 10 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#100031 (improve "try ignoring the field" diagnostic)
 - rust-lang#100325 (Rustdoc-Json: Don't remove impls for items imported from private modules)
 - rust-lang#100377 (Replace - with _ in fluent slugs to improve developer workflows)
 - rust-lang#100458 (Adjust span of fn argument declaration)
 - rust-lang#100514 (Delay span bug when failing to normalize negative coherence impl subject due to other malformed impls)
 - rust-lang#100528 (Support 1st group of RISC-V Bitmanip backend target features)
 - rust-lang#100559 (Parser simplifications)
 - rust-lang#100568 (Fix STD build for ESP-IDF)
 - rust-lang#100582 ([rustdoc] Fix handling of stripped enum variant in JSON output format)
 - rust-lang#100586 (Reland changes replacing num_cpus with available_parallelism )

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 710bd23 into rust-lang:master Aug 15, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.65.0 milestone Aug 15, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Chance to improve "try ignoring the field" message
6 participants